The Ballad of John and Yoko hits all the wrong notes with the critics.

Yoko is trying to muck with history.  Rather, Yoko is giving her version of what she thinks is history.  I mean, I cannot completely blame her for telling John’s story in her own words, and in her own way.  You’d expect to get a skewed vision of Lennon history that intensely focuses on their relationship.

We all know John’s story, and I have to admit it is intersting and frustrating to see a skewed vision of that story play out.  It’s especially interesting to see that story play out onstage yet again.  You’d think that they would have thought about that after the short-lived Lennon musical.

I would really like to see and hear Yoko tell her story about her time and relationship with John.  I know John’s story, almost down to the day to day minutiae.  I would love to see Yoko pen her own memoirs. 

Here’s what we’ve read.

A new Broadway musical about John Lennon has been panned by everyone – apart from his widow, Yoko Ono, who was closely involved in the production.

“I think he would be jumping up and down,” said Ono, 72, “I think he would have loved it.”

But with virtual unanimity the critics disagreed. The New York Daily News described Lennon as “so goofy that someone arriving late might imagine he had stumbled into [Monty Python’s] Spamalot next door. The New York Times bemoaned its “fortune-cookie wisdom” which produced a “drippy version of [Lennon’s] life, written and directed with equal clunkiness.” Variety said the score sounded “unfinished in a sad and rather ghoulish way”.

The discrepancy in views is hardly surprising given one critic’s belief that a key flaw in the production is that it is “Ono-centric”. Passing quickly over Lennon’s career in the Beatles, it gives little time to his first marriage, or to the son he fathered before he met the Japanese artist. It also omits his affair that forced the couple apart for more than a year.

Meanwhile, phrases such as “We’re all one”, “Love is the answer”, and “Be real” are repeatedly projected on to the stage.

“Imagine there’s no Beatles, imagine no iconic movies, no White Album, no poetry books, no drawings,” wrote Linda Winer for Newsday. “Then imagine there’s no son before Sean, no mistress named May Pang, no deep depression, nothing really serious with drugs.”

The director, Don Scardino, who wrote the musical using Lennon’s words, insists the show represents the musician’s own view of his life.

“Looking back on his life you get to a certain point in the story and there is no story of John without Yoko,” he told Reuters. “He was hurt when people didn’t either embrace Yoko or his love for Yoko, but finally he didn’t care.”

When Ono went on stage for a curtain call on Sunday she was unrepentant. “People will say something so let them say it,” she told the audience.

Source: Buzzle


3 Responses

  1. Yoko is part artist and businesswoman. She knows it’s the myth and not the truth that keeps Lennon alive. She wants the story to be untold and retold, so people can debate him ,and her, and keep their names alive.

  2. This IS “the short-lived Lennon musical” which opened on Broadway in 2005 and closed after 6 weeks. This is not a new show! There is no review of any such “new” show in the NY Daily News or anywhere else. Also, note Yoko’s age in the article: 72 – which she was in 2005.

    I have no idea why this is popping back up as “news” in 2008?!

  3. I cannot imagine John jumping up and down for anything, much less something as pretentious as a play glorifying a personal aspect of his life.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: